ATI Radeon X1600 PRO vs HD 7660D

Place in the ranking	1032	1362
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.10	no data
Power efficiency	0.91	0.44
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code name	Devastator	RV530
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 October 2012 (12 years ago)	1 October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$122	$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 7660D and ATI X1600 PRO have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	no data
Core clock speed	800 MHz	500 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,303 million	157 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	41 Watt
Texture fill rate	19.20	2.000
Floating-point processing power	0.6144 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	4
TMUs	24	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	IGP	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	256 MB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	390 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	12.48 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	5.0	3.0
OpenGL	4.4	2.0
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7660D 1.32
+408%

ATI X1600 PRO 0.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7660D 507
+417%

ATI X1600 PRO 98

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

15
+650%

2−3

−650%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

8.13
+1123%

99.50

−1123%

HD 7660D has 1123% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Dota 2	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Fortnite	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
World of Tanks	54 +440%	10−11 −440%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Dota 2	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6	0−1
Valorant	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Dota 2	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Far Cry 5	1−2	0−1
Valorant	1−2	0−1