NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 7600G

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7600G with NVS 510, including specs and performance data.

HD 7600G
2012
19 Watt
0.85

NVS 510 outperforms HD 7600G by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1137922
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.10
Power efficiency3.073.51
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameDevastatorGK107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed320 MHz797 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate10.1812.75
Floating-point processing power0.3256 TFLOPS0.306 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared891 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.51 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7600G 0.85
NVS 510 1.79
+111%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7600G 327
NVS 510 691
+111%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−110%
65−70
+110%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−110%
65−70
+110%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−110%
65−70
+110%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hitman 3 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 1.79
Recency 1 September 2012 23 October 2012
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 35 Watt

HD 7600G has 84.2% lower power consumption.

NVS 510, on the other hand, has a 110.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The NVS 510 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7600G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7600G is a notebook card while NVS 510 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7600G
Radeon HD 7600G
NVIDIA NVS 510
NVS 510

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 88 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 60 votes

Rate NVS 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.