GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 7560D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon HD 7510 OEM Radeon HD 7540D IGP Radeon HD 7560D Radeon HD 7570 Radeon HD 7570 OEM
VS
GT 545 GT 545 OEM GT 640 OEM Rebrand GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 3 GTX 550 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7560D and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7560D
2012
65 Watt
1.03

GTS 450 Rev. 2 outperforms HD 7560D by a whopping 270% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD 7560D HD 7560D
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1077686
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency1.262.85
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteGF116
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)15 March 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256192
Core clock speed760 MHz783 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt106 Watt
Texture fill rate12.1625.06
Floating-point processing power0.3891 TFLOPS0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared902 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.73 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−261%
65−70
+261%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.61no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Valorant 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
−256%
160−170
+256%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Dota 2 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Valorant 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Dota 2 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Valorant 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Valorant 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Valorant 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

This is how HD 7560D and GTS 450 Rev. 2 compete in popular games:

  • GTS 450 Rev. 2 is 261% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.03 3.81
Recency 2 October 2012 15 March 2011
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 106 Watt

HD 7560D has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 63.1% lower power consumption.

GTS 450 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 269.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7560D in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Radeon HD 7560D
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD 7560D Radeon HD 7560D
vs
8800 GT GeForce 8800 GT
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
HD 7560D Radeon HD 7560D
vs
9800 GT GeForce 9800 GT
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
vs
RX 580 2048SP RX 580 2048SP
HD 8670D HD 8670D
vs
R3 Graphics R3 Graphics
HD 7660D HD 7660D
vs
R5 340X OEM R5 340X OEM
HD 7560D HD 7560D
vs
HD Graphics 6000 HD Graphics 6000
HD 7560D HD 7560D
vs
GTS 450 Rev. 3 GTS 450 Rev. 3
HD 7560D HD 7560D
vs
R5 M230 Rebrand R5 M230 Rebrand
HD 6550D HD 6550D
vs
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
GTX 1080 Ti GTX 1080 Ti
vs
GT 730 OEM GT 730 OEM
GTX 1080 Ti GTX 1080 Ti
vs
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2
GTX 1080 Ti GTX 1080 Ti
vs
7600 GT 7600 GT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 146 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 40 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7560D or GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.