Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs HD 7480D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7480D and Radeon RX 6750 GRE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7480D
2012
65 Watt
0.72

RX 6750 GRE outperforms HD 7480D by a whopping 6760% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking116663
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.40
Power efficiency0.7613.54
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteNavi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 7480D and RX 6750 GRE have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282560
Core clock speed723 MHzno data
Boost clock speed800 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate6.400413.0
Floating-point processing power0.2048 TFLOPSno data
ROPs464
TMUs8160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared18 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7480D 0.72
RX 6750 GRE 49.39
+6760%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7480D 278
RX 6750 GRE 19031
+6746%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−6400%
650−700
+6400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.300.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−6650%
270−280
+6650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−6718%
750−800
+6718%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−6567%
400−450
+6567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−6674%
2100−2150
+6674%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−6650%
270−280
+6650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−6718%
750−800
+6718%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−6567%
400−450
+6567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−6438%
850−900
+6438%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−6674%
2100−2150
+6674%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−6650%
270−280
+6650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Hitman 3 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−6718%
750−800
+6718%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−6567%
400−450
+6567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−6400%
650−700
+6400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−6674%
2100−2150
+6674%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−6567%
400−450
+6567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%

This is how HD 7480D and RX 6750 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE is 6400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 49.39
Recency 2 October 2012 17 October 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 250 Watt

HD 7480D has 284.6% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 6759.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7480D in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Radeon HD 7480D
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Radeon RX 6750 GRE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 267 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7480D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 228 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.