P106-100 vs Radeon HD 7400G

Place in the ranking	1166	323
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.81	9.59
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Scrapper	GP106
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	2 October 2012 (12 years ago)	19 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	1280
Core clock speed	327 MHz	1506 MHz
Boost clock speed	424 MHz	1709 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.088	136.7
Floating-point processing power	0.1628 TFLOPS	4.375 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	48
TMUs	12	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	250 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	6 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.2 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7400G 0.69

P106-100 16.61
+2307%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7400G 267

P106-100 6408
+2300%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−2233%

70−75
+2233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −2275%	95−100 +2275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2233%	70−75 +2233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2233%	70−75 +2233%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2300%	120−130 +2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2264%	260−270 +2264%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −2233%	140−150 +2233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −2233%	700−750 +2233%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −2275%	95−100 +2275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2233%	70−75 +2233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2233%	70−75 +2233%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2300%	120−130 +2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2264%	260−270 +2264%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −2233%	140−150 +2233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −2300%	240−250 +2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −2233%	700−750 +2233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −2275%	95−100 +2275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2233%	70−75 +2233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2233%	70−75 +2233%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2300%	120−130 +2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2264%	260−270 +2264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −2233%	140−150 +2233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −2300%	240−250 +2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −2233%	700−750 +2233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−2300%

24−27
+2300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2233%	140−150 +2233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −2233%	70−75 +2233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −2150%	45−50 +2150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−2233%

70−75
+2233%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2150%

45−50
+2150%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.69	16.61
Recency	2 October 2012	19 June 2017
Chip lithography	32 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	120 Watt

HD 7400G has 605.9% lower power consumption.

P106-100, on the other hand, has a 2307.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7400G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7400G is a desktop card while P106-100 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.