Radeon RX 6600 vs HD 7350 PCI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated110
Place by popularitynot in top-10015
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.88
Power efficiencyno data20.76
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameCedarNavi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 January 2012 (12 years ago)13 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801792
Core clock speed650 MHz1626 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2491 MHz
Number of transistors292 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt132 Watt
Texture fill rate5.200279.0
Floating-point processing powerno data8.928 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mm190 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2012 13 October 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 132 Watt

HD 7350 PCI has 594.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7350 PCI and Radeon RX 6600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7350 PCI
Radeon HD 7350 PCI
AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 46 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7350 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9332 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.