P106-090 vs Radeon HD 7340

Place in the ranking	1257	583
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.52	5.56
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Loveland	GP106
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	6 June 2012 (12 years ago)	31 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$552.69	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	768
Core clock speed	523 MHz	1354 MHz
Boost clock speed	680 MHz	1531 MHz
Number of transistors	450 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.184	73.49
Floating-point processing power	0.08368 TFLOPS	2.352 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	48
TMUs	8	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	250 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	3 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.2 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7340 0.40

P106-090 6.08
+1420%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7340 153

P106-090 2342
+1431%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−1400%

30−33
+1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −1329%	400−450 +1329%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1344%	130−140 +1344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −1329%	400−450 +1329%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1344%	130−140 +1344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −1329%	400−450 +1329%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1400%

30−33
+1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1400%

30−33
+1400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.40	6.08
Recency	6 June 2012	31 July 2017
Chip lithography	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	75 Watt

HD 7340 has 316.7% lower power consumption.

P106-090, on the other hand, has a 1420% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7340 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7340 is a desktop card while P106-090 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.