UHD Graphics G1 vs Radeon HD 7310

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1302not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.28no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameLovelandIce Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)29 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80256
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors450 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00014.40
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x1
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.1.97

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 29 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7310 and UHD Graphics G1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7310 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics G1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7310
Radeon HD 7310
Intel UHD Graphics G1
UHD Graphics G1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 153 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 166 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.