Radeon RX 6400 vs HD 7310

Place in the ranking	1314	288
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	53.43
Power efficiency	1.29	25.82
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Loveland	Navi 24
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	6 June 2012 (12 years ago)	19 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	768
Core clock speed	500 MHz	1923 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2321 MHz
Number of transistors	450 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	53 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.000	111.4
Floating-point processing power	0.08 TFLOPS	3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	32
TMUs	8	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	IGP	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7310 0.33

RX 6400 19.39
+5776%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7310 128

RX 6400 7624
+5856%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −5355%	600−650 +5355%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5567%	170−180 +5567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −5355%	600−650 +5355%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5567%	170−180 +5567%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −5733%	350−400 +5733%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −5650%	230−240 +5650%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −5355%	600−650 +5355%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5567%	170−180 +5567%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −5614%	400−450 +5614%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −5733%	350−400 +5733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −5614%	400−450 +5614%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −5650%	230−240 +5650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −5700%	290−300 +5700%
World of Tanks	12−14 −5669%	750−800 +5669%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −5355%	600−650 +5355%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5567%	170−180 +5567%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −5614%	400−450 +5614%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −5733%	350−400 +5733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −5614%	400−450 +5614%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −5567%	170−180 +5567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −5400%	110−120 +5400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5567%	170−180 +5567%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −5650%	230−240 +5650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −5650%	230−240 +5650%
Valorant	5−6 −5700%	290−300 +5700%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −5567%	850−900 +5567%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −5567%	850−900 +5567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −5567%	850−900 +5567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −5400%	110−120 +5400%
Dota 2	14−16 −5567%	850−900 +5567%
Valorant	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.33	19.39
Recency	6 June 2012	19 January 2022
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	53 Watt

HD 7310 has 194.4% lower power consumption.

RX 6400, on the other hand, has a 5775.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7310 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.