Radeon RX 7800 XT vs HD 6970M Crossfire

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire with Radeon RX 7800 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD 6970M Crossfire
2011
2x2 GB GDDR5
9.12

RX 7800 XT outperforms HD 6970M Crossfire by a whopping 592% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking47530
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.84
Power efficiencyno data16.58
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBlackcomb XTNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19203840
Core clock speed680 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2430 MHz
Number of transistors2x1700 Million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data263 Watt
Texture fill rateno data583.2
Floating-point processing powerno data37.32 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970M Crossfire 9.12
RX 7800 XT 63.07
+592%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6970M Crossfire 5542
RX 7800 XT 65611
+1084%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6970M Crossfire 22667
RX 7800 XT 134322
+493%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p94
−591%
650−700
+591%
Full HD101
−116%
218
+116%
1440p16−18
−663%
122
+663%
4K10−12
−630%
73
+630%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.29
1440pno data4.09
4Kno data6.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1743%
258
+1743%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−709%
178
+709%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−1608%
222
+1608%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−611%
190−200
+611%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−500%
110−120
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1279%
193
+1279%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−438%
110−120
+438%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−504%
150−160
+504%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−277%
230−240
+277%
Hitman 3 16−18
−629%
120−130
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−357%
230−240
+357%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−454%
150−160
+454%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−372%
110−120
+372%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−753%
250−260
+753%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−150%
150−160
+150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−1086%
261
+1086%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−1292%
181
+1292%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−611%
190−200
+611%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−500%
110−120
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1050%
161
+1050%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−438%
110−120
+438%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−504%
150−160
+504%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−277%
230−240
+277%
Hitman 3 16−18
−629%
120−130
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−357%
230−240
+357%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−454%
150−160
+454%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−372%
110−120
+372%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−1227%
398
+1227%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−428%
130−140
+428%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−150%
150−160
+150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−491%
130
+491%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−1115%
158
+1115%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−500%
110−120
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−957%
148
+957%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−438%
110−120
+438%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−264%
222
+264%
Hitman 3 16−18
−629%
120−130
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−437%
274
+437%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−1033%
340
+1033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−700%
200
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−142%
145
+142%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−372%
110−120
+372%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−678%
140−150
+678%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−600%
95−100
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1222%
119
+1222%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−2380%
124
+2380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−722%
70−75
+722%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2325%
97
+2325%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−630%
70−75
+630%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−595%
270−280
+595%
Hitman 3 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−1042%
217
+1042%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1038%
148
+1038%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−2330%
243
+2330%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−1738%
147
+1738%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−305%
230−240
+305%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−600%
100−110
+600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−813%
70−75
+813%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−917%
60−65
+917%
Hitman 3 5−6
−980%
50−55
+980%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−503%
220−230
+503%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1243%
90−95
+1243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1867%
118
+1867%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1680%
89
+1680%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1700%
72
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1391%
164
+1391%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−2500%
130
+2500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−2133%
67
+2133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−611%
60−65
+611%

This is how HD 6970M Crossfire and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 591% faster in 900p
  • RX 7800 XT is 116% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 663% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 630% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 4300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7800 XT surpassed HD 6970M Crossfire in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.12 63.07
Recency 6 January 2011 25 August 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm

RX 7800 XT has a 591.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2707 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.