GeForce GTX 750 vs Radeon HD 6970

Place in the ranking	542	501
Place by popularity	not in top-100	84
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.02	4.39
Power efficiency	2.03	10.87
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	Cayman	GM107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	14 December 2010 (14 years ago)	18 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$369	$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 750 has 330% better value for money than HD 6970.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	512
Core clock speed	no data	1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	880 MHz	1085 MHz
Number of transistors	2,640 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	550 Watt	55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	95 °C
Texture fill rate	84.48	34.72
Floating-point processing power	2.703 TFLOPS	1.111 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	96	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	145 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz	5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor support	no data	3 displays
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire	+	-
Blu Ray 3D	-	+
3D Gaming	-	+
3D Vision	-	+
3D Vision Live	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 11	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.1.126
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970 7.04

GTX 750 8.29
+17.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6970 2836

GTX 750 3339
+17.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 6970 3470

GTX 750 3970
+14.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
Valorant	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Dota 2	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −9.4%	35−40 +9.4%
Fortnite	40−45 −13.6%	50−55 +13.6%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −16.7%	70−75 +16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Valorant	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
World of Tanks	110−120 −15%	130−140 +15%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Dota 2	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −9.4%	35−40 +9.4%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −16.7%	70−75 +16.7%
Valorant	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
World of Tanks	50−55 −13.2%	60−65 +13.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Valorant	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Fortnite	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.04	8.29
Recency	14 December 2010	18 February 2014
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	550 Watt	55 Watt

GTX 750 has a 17.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6970 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.