T400 4 GB vs Radeon HD 6870

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6870 with T400 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

HD 6870
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
5.75

T400 4 GB outperforms HD 6870 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking597458
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.00no data
Power efficiency2.6122.42
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBartsTU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date21 October 2010 (14 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$239 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1120384
Core clock speedno data420 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate50.4034.20
Floating-point processing power2.016 TFLOPS1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs5624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length220 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth134.4 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort3x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6870 5.75
T400 4 GB 9.81
+70.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6870 2216
T400 4 GB 3781
+70.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p61
−63.9%
100−110
+63.9%
Full HD62
−61.3%
100−110
+61.3%
1200p39
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.85no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Hitman 3 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Hitman 3 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Hitman 3 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Hitman 3 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Hitman 3 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

This is how HD 6870 and T400 4 GB compete in popular games:

  • T400 4 GB is 64% faster in 900p
  • T400 4 GB is 61% faster in 1080p
  • T400 4 GB is 67% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.75 9.81
Recency 21 October 2010 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 30 Watt

T400 4 GB has a 70.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 403.3% lower power consumption.

The T400 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6870 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6870 is a desktop card while T400 4 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6870
Radeon HD 6870
NVIDIA T400 4 GB
T400 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 363 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 57 votes

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.