Radeon R5 M320 vs HD 6775G2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1062
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameno dataJet
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores880320
Compute unitsno data5
Core clock speedno data780 MHz
Boost clock speedno data855 MHz
Number of transistorsno data690 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no dataunknown
Texture fill rateno data17.10
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5472 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11DirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno dataNot Listed
Vulkan-+
Mantle-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2011 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

R5 M320 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6775G2 and Radeon R5 M320. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6775G2
Radeon HD 6775G2
AMD Radeon R5 M320
Radeon R5 M320

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6775G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 45 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.