ATI Radeon X300 vs HD 6480G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1185	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.29	no data
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code name	Sumo	RV370
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	14 June 2011 (13 years ago)	1 September 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	240	no data
Core clock speed	444 MHz	375 MHz
Number of transistors	1,178 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	36 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.328	1.500
Floating-point processing power	0.2131 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	12	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	64 MB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	6.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	9.0
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.4	2.0
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	14 June 2011	1 September 2004
Chip lithography	32 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	36 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---