Radeon R7 M265DX vs HD 6450M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6450M and Radeon R7 M265DX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6450M
2011
1 GB DDR3
0.60

R7 M265DX outperforms HD 6450M by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12671102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameSeymourTopaz
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (15 years ago)12 October 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160384
Core clock speed600 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data940 MHz
Number of transistors370 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate4.80022.56
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS0.7219 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs824
L1 Cache16 KB96 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−75%
14−16
+75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Valorant 27−30
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Valorant 27−30
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Valorant 27−30
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Valorant 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

This is how HD 6450M and R7 M265DX compete in popular games:

  • R7 M265DX is 75% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.60 1.19
Recency 4 January 2011 12 October 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

R7 M265DX has a 98% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 M265DX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6450M in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6450M or Radeon R7 M265DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.