Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) vs HD 6380G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6380G and Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6380G
2011
35 Watt
0.45

R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) outperforms HD 6380G by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12461207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.02no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.1 (2014)
GPU code nameSuperSumoBeema/Mullins
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160128
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.200no data
Floating-point processing power0.128 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 27−30
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 27−30
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 27−30
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 1−2

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) is ahead in 17 tests (57%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (43%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.45 0.56
Recency 14 June 2011 29 April 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) has a 24.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6380G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6380G
Radeon HD 6380G
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 36 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6380G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6380G or Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.