GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon HD 6310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6310 and GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6310
2010
18 Watt
0.32

RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms HD 6310 by a whopping 11622% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1313123
Place by popularitynot in top-10052
Power efficiency1.2251.41
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLovelandAD107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 November 2010 (14 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores802560
Core clock speed276 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1755 MHz
Number of transistors450 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate2.208140.4
Floating-point processing power0.04416 TFLOPS8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6310 0.32
RTX 4050 Mobile 37.51
+11622%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6310 122
RTX 4050 Mobile 14451
+11745%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6310 251
RTX 4050 Mobile 30465
+12037%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6310 691
RTX 4050 Mobile 85660
+12297%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−195
1440p-0−148
4K-0−131

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5050%
103
+5050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2667%
80−85
+2667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4050%
83
+4050%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1975%
80−85
+1975%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1938%
160−170
+1938%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3475%
140−150
+3475%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−357%
120−130
+357%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2667%
80−85
+2667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3450%
71
+3450%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1975%
80−85
+1975%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1938%
160−170
+1938%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4100%
168
+4100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−800%
80−85
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−357%
120−130
+357%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2667%
80−85
+2667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3150%
65
+3150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1975%
80−85
+1975%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1938%
160−170
+1938%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3525%
145
+3525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−789%
80
+789%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−85.7%
52
+85.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 36
Hitman 3 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3250%
65−70
+3250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 24−27

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 117
+0%
117
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+0%
92
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
+0%
70
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+0%
84
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+0%
59
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+0%
47
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+0%
53
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
+0%
26
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 4050 Mobile is 5050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 Mobile is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 37.51
Recency 9 November 2010 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 50 Watt

HD 6310 has 177.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 4050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 11621.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6310 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6310
Radeon HD 6310
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 258 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2768 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.