Radeon HD 7610M vs ATI HD 5850

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5850 with Radeon HD 7610M, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5850
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
5.16
+215%

ATI HD 5850 outperforms HD 7610M by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking621952
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.64no data
Power efficiency2.345.62
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameCypressWhistler
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 2009 (15 years ago)7 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1440400
Core clock speed725 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate52.209.000
Floating-point processing power2.088 TFLOPS0.36 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs7220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5850 5.16
+215%
HD 7610M 1.64

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5850 1988
+215%
HD 7610M 632

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

ATI HD 5850 3401
+354%
HD 7610M 749

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 5850 13267
+259%
HD 7610M 3691

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p59
+228%
18−20
−228%
Full HD56
+331%
13
−331%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.34no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Hitman 3 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+38.2%
30−35
−38.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Hitman 3 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+38.2%
30−35
−38.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Hitman 3 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+38.2%
30−35
−38.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+300%
8−9
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

This is how ATI HD 5850 and HD 7610M compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5850 is 228% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5850 is 331% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the ATI HD 5850 is 560% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, ATI HD 5850 surpassed HD 7610M in all 51 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.16 1.64
Recency 30 September 2009 7 January 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 20 Watt

ATI HD 5850 has a 214.6% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 7610M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 655% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 5850 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7610M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5850 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 7610M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 5850
AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Radeon HD 7610M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 254 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 37 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.