PlayStation 4 GPU vs ATI Radeon HD 5830

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking659not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.79no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameCypressLiverpool
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 February 2010 (14 years ago)24 November 2013 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11201152
Core clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate44.8057.60
Floating-point processing power1.792 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs5672

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length282 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1*
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 February 2010 24 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 75 Watt

PlayStation 4 GPU has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5830 and PlayStation 4 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5830 is a desktop card while PlayStation 4 GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5830
Radeon HD 5830
AMD PlayStation 4 GPU
PlayStation 4 GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 75 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 393 votes

Rate PlayStation 4 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.