GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon HD 5830

Place in performance ranking	623	118
Place by popularity	not in top-100	34
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.47	21.04
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Cypress	Turing TU106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 February 2010 (14 years ago)	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$349
Current price	$11.97	$397 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2060 has 4377% better value for money than ATI HD 5830.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1120	1920
Core clock speed	800 MHz	1320 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1620 MHz
Number of transistors	2,154 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	44.80	201.6
Floating-point performance	1,792.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	282 mm	229 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5830 4.49

RTX 2060 36.64
+716%

GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms Radeon HD 5830 by 716% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 5830 1733

RTX 2060 14149
+716%

GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms Radeon HD 5830 by 716% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

ATI HD 5830 1930

RTX 2060 19338
+902%

GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms Radeon HD 5830 by 902% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 −757%	120 +757%
1440p	8−9 −813%	73 +813%
4K	6−7 −733%	50 +733%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8
−814%

60−65

+814%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −820%	92 +820%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −778%	79 +778%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −772%	157 +772%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −783%	106 +783%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −814%	60−65 +814%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −850%	114 +850%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −814%	128 +814%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −775%	140 +775%
Hitman 3	12−14 −717%	98 +717%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −779%	211 +779%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −800%	144 +800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −808%	109 +808%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −775%	140−150 +775%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −742%	101 +742%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −767%	78 +767%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −814%	64 +814%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −775%	140 +775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −860%	96 +860%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −814%	60−65 +814%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −810%	91 +810%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −850%	95 +850%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −824%	194 +824%
Hitman 3	5−6 −860%	48 +860%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −723%	247 +723%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −743%	118 +743%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −775%	105 +775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −775%	140−150 +775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −750%	136 +750%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −804%	244 +804%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −833%	56 +833%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −817%	55 +817%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −788%	71 +788%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −814%	60−65 +814%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −775%	70 +775%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −775%	105 +775%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −757%	120 +757%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −775%	140−150 +775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −813%	73 +813%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −800%	45 +800%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−860%

96
+860%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −717%	98 +717%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −875%	35−40 +875%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −740%	42 +740%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −829%	65 +829%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −833%	27−30 +833%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −725%	65−70 +725%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −744%	75−80 +744%
Hitman 3	6−7 −800%	54 +800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −790%	89 +790%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −744%	76 +744%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −780%	85−90 +780%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −767%	50−55 +767%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −900%	30 +900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
−722%

+722%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −900%	40 +900%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −825%	37 +825%
Hitman 3	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −820%	45−50 +820%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −967%	32 +967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −750%	51 +750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −833%	28 +833%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1100%	24 +1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −833%	28 +833%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −733%	25 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −743%	59 +743%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −767%	52 +767%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −740%	42 +740%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −750%	17 +750%