Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs ATI HD 5770

Place in the ranking	660	419
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.80	no data
Power efficiency	2.83	11.77
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Juniper	Polaris 21
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	13 October 2009 (15 years ago)	11 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	1024
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1275 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1202 MHz
Number of transistors	1,040 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	34.00	81.60
Floating-point processing power	1.36 TFLOPS	2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	208 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	1450 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	92.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5770 4.42

RX 560X Mobile 11.05
+150%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

ATI HD 5770 2410

RX 560X Mobile 8212
+241%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 5770 11699

RX 560X Mobile 19829
+69.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	24 −150%	60−65 +150%
Full HD	48 +41.2%	34 −41.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.31

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9

−188%

23
+188%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −108%	25 +108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −650%	30 +650%
Battlefield 5	10−12 −345%	49 +345%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −113%	17 +113%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −289%	35 +289%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −250%	42 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −304%	109 +304%
Hitman 3	10−11 −140%	24 +140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −107%	60−65 +107%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −400%	45 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −292%	47 +292%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −250%	56 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −52.3%	65−70 +52.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −308%	49 +308%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −425%	21 +425%
Battlefield 5	10−12 −227%	36 +227%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −87.5%	15 +87.5%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −222%	29 +222%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −133%	28 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −289%	105 +289%
Hitman 3	10−11 −130%	23 +130%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −107%	60−65 +107%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −300%	36 +300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −158%	30−35 +158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −163%	42 +163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −70.6%	27−30 +70.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −52.3%	65−70 +52.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −33.3%	16 +33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −325%	16−18 +325%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −62.5%	13 +62.5%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −133%	21 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −40.7%	38 +40.7%
Hitman 3	10−11 −110%	21 +110%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −107%	60−65 +107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −131%	37 +131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −29.4%	22 +29.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +300%	11 −300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−150%

30
+150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −643%	50−55 +643%
Hitman 3	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −130%	21−24 +130%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −150%	70−75 +150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−125%

18−20
+125%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Hitman 3	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	9−10

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−100%

10−11
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

8−9

+0%

8−9

+0%

This is how ATI HD 5770 and RX 560X Mobile compete in popular games:

RX 560X Mobile is 150% faster in 900p
ATI HD 5770 is 41% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI HD 5770 is 300% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 560X Mobile is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

ATI HD 5770 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
RX 560X Mobile is ahead in 66 tests (94%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.42	11.05
Recency	13 October 2009	11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	65 Watt

RX 560X Mobile has a 150% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 66.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 560X Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5770 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.