Quadro K420 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5750 with Quadro K420, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5750
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 86 Watt
3.02
+57.3%

ATI HD 5750 outperforms K420 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking775906
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.08
Power efficiency2.413.21
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameJuniperGK107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 October 2009 (15 years ago)22 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$96.67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores720192
Core clock speed700 MHz876 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt41 Watt
Texture fill rate25.2014.02
Floating-point processing power1.008 TFLOPS0.3364 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length178 mm160 mm
Width2-slot1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB/2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/sUp to 29 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5750 3.02
+57.3%
Quadro K420 1.92

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5750 1164
+57.3%
Quadro K420 740

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.02 1.92
Recency 13 October 2009 22 July 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 41 Watt

ATI HD 5750 has a 57.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Quadro K420, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 109.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 5750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K420 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5750 is a desktop card while Quadro K420 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5750
Radeon HD 5750
NVIDIA Quadro K420
Quadro K420

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 298 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 143 votes

Rate Quadro K420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.