NVS 310 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670

Place in the ranking	878	1189
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.26	0.04
Power efficiency	2.25	2.27
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Redwood	GF119
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	14 January 2010 (15 years ago)	26 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$119	$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI HD 5670 has 550% better value for money than NVS 310.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	48
Core clock speed	775 MHz	523 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	64 Watt	20 Watt
Texture fill rate	15.50	4.184
Floating-point processing power	0.62 TFLOPS	0.1004 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	4
TMUs	20	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	168 mm	156 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	875 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	14 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	2x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	-	2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5670 2.09
+217%

NVS 310 0.66

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5670 802
+215%

NVS 310 255

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	26 +225%	8−9 −225%
Full HD	32 +220%	10−12 −220%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.72
+328%

15.90

−328%

ATI HD 5670 has 328% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Elden Ring	3−4	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Dota 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Elden Ring	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Fortnite	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
World of Tanks	40−45 +233%	12−14 −233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Dota 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
World of Tanks	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4	0−1
Valorant	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Elden Ring	1−2	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%