GeForce GT 320M vs ATI Radeon HD 5570

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5570 with GeForce GT 320M, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5570
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 39 Watt
1.24
+359%

ATI HD 5570 outperforms GT 320M by a whopping 359% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10571359
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.181.32
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRedwoodG96C
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 February 2010 (15 years ago)15 June 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40032
Core clock speed650 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors627 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)39 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate13.008.000
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-II
Length165 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 5570 1.24
+359%
GT 320M 0.27

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5570 476
+353%
GT 320M 105

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 5570 3917
+225%
GT 320M 1205

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p15
+400%
3−4
−400%
Full HD23
+360%
5−6
−360%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Atomic Heart 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 30−35
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Atomic Heart 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Valorant 30−35
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Valorant 30−35
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Valorant 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how ATI HD 5570 and GT 320M compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5570 is 400% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5570 is 360% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI HD 5570 is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5570 is ahead in 30 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 0.27
Recency 9 February 2010 15 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 39 Watt 14 Watt

ATI HD 5570 has a 359.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

GT 320M, on the other hand, has 178.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 5570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5570 is a desktop card while GeForce GT 320M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5570
Radeon HD 5570
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3
295 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3
132 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5570 or GeForce GT 320M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.