GeForce 8800 GTX vs ATI Radeon HD 4860

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated971
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
Power efficiencyno data0.69
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV790G80
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date9 September 2009 (15 years ago)8 November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640575
Core clock speed700 MHz576 MHz
Number of transistors959 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt155 Watt
Texture fill rate22.4036.86
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data270 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB768 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s86.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 September 2009 8 November 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 768 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 155 Watt

ATI HD 4860 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 63.6% more advanced lithography process, and 19.2% lower power consumption.

8800 GTX, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4860 and GeForce 8800 GTX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4860
Radeon HD 4860
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 140 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.