Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs ATI Radeon HD 4850

Place in the ranking	809	526
Place by popularity	not in top-100	48
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.26	no data
Power efficiency	1.69	18.85
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	RV770	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	25 June 2008 (16 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	80
Core clock speed	625 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	956 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.00	no data
Floating-point processing power	1 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	40	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Length	246 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	993 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	63.55 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12_1
Shader Model	4.1	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4850 2.66

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.57
+185%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 4850 8972

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729
+142%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

ATI HD 4850 11272

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21931
+94.6%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

ATI HD 4850 72891

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 166479
+128%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	29 −176%	80−85 +176%
Full HD	40 +111%	19 −111%
1200p	19 −163%	50−55 +163%
1440p	3−4 −233%	10 +233%
4K	4−5 −250%	14 +250%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.98	no data
1440p	66.33	no data
4K	49.75	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−180%

14
+180%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	19
Battlefield 5	4−5 −450%	21−24 +450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −160%	13 +160%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −277%	45−50 +277%
Hitman 3	7−8 −129%	16 +129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −105%	40−45 +105%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1800%	38 +1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −127%	24−27 +127%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −63.2%	62 +63.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	16
Battlefield 5	4−5 −450%	21−24 +450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −100%	10 +100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −277%	45−50 +277%
Hitman 3	7−8 −114%	15 +114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −105%	40−45 +105%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1250%	27 +1250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −118%	24 +118%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −69.2%	21−24 +69.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −28.9%	49 +28.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	10−11
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −60%	8 +60%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −277%	45−50 +277%
Hitman 3	7−8 −71.4%	12 +71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +31.3%	16 −31.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −81.8%	20 +81.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +18.2%	11 −18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −44.7%	55−60 +44.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−233%

20−22
+233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Hitman 3	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −400%	10 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −194%	45−50 +194%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−117%

12−14
+117%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−75%

7−8
+75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 +0%	16 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

This is how ATI HD 4850 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 176% faster in 900p
ATI HD 4850 is 111% faster in 1080p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 163% faster in 1200p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 233% faster in 1440p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI HD 4850 is 31% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 1800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

ATI HD 4850 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 55 tests (81%)
there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.66	7.57
Recency	25 June 2008	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	55 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	28 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 184.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 292.9% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4850 is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.