Data Center GPU Max NEXT vs ATI Radeon HD 4770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking842not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.29no data
Power efficiency2.06no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameRV740Rialto Bridge
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 April 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64020480
Core clock speed750 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors826 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate24.002,048
Floating-point processing power0.96 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs321280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length203 mm267 mm
Width2-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz3.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s3,205 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 800 Watt

ATI HD 4770 has 900% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max NEXT, on the other hand, has a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4770 and Data Center GPU Max NEXT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4770
Radeon HD 4770
Intel Data Center GPU Max NEXT
Data Center GPU Max NEXT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 72 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 46 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max NEXT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.