RTX A500 Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 4710

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated310
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV730GA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 September 2008 (16 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3202048
Core clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistors514 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate24.0098.37
Floating-point performance0.48 gflops6.296 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length193 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2008 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 60 Watt

ATI HD 4710 has 1.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4710 and RTX A500 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4710 is a desktop card while RTX A500 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4710
Radeon HD 4710
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
RTX A500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 4710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 74 votes

Rate RTX A500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.