GeForce2 MX 400 vs ATI Radeon HD 4550

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1200not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.70no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameRV710NV11 B2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 September 2008 (16 years ago)3 March 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed600 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors242 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.8000.8
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2SDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed655 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.48 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)7.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 2008 3 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 180 nm

ATI HD 4550 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4550 and GeForce2 MX 400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4550
Radeon HD 4550
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400
GeForce2 MX 400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 112 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 116 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.