FirePro R5000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4270 with FirePro R5000, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 4270
2010
512 MB
0.26

R5000 outperforms HD 4270 by a whopping 2335% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1421626
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.27
Power efficiencyno data3.25
ArchitectureRV6xx (2008−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRS880MPitcairn
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2010 (16 years ago)25 February 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40768
Core clock speed590 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data350 Watt
Texture fill rateno data39.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.267 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4270 0.26
FirePro R5000 6.33
+2335%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4270 109
Samples: 25
FirePro R5000 2646
+2328%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
Valorant 24−27
−2300%
600−650
+2300%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2208%
300−310
+2208%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Dota 2 9−10
−2233%
210−220
+2233%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Valorant 24−27
−2300%
600−650
+2300%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Dota 2 9−10
−2233%
210−220
+2233%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Valorant 24−27
−2300%
600−650
+2300%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Valorant 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 6.33
Recency 1 May 2010 25 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm

FirePro R5000 has a 2335% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro R5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4270 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4270 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro R5000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate FirePro R5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4270 or FirePro R5000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.