GeForce 9600 GT vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 3850 X2 and GeForce 9600 GT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 3850 X2
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 140 Watt
2.13
+70.4%

ATI HD 3850 X2 outperforms 9600 GT by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8681038
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.090.06
Power efficiency1.040.90
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV670G94
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 April 2008 (16 years ago)21 February 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI HD 3850 X2 has 50% better value for money than 9600 GT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32064
Core clock speed669 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors666 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt96 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate10.7020.80
Floating-point processing power0.4282 TFLOPS0.208 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed828 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth52.99 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoHDTVTwo Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 3850 X2 2.13
+70.4%
9600 GT 1.25

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3850 X2 822
+70.5%
9600 GT 482

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.13 1.25
Recency 4 April 2008 21 February 2008
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 96 Watt

ATI HD 3850 X2 has a 70.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

9600 GT, on the other hand, has 45.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600 GT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Radeon HD 3850 X2
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 9600 GT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3850 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 2030 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.