GeForce FX 5900 XT vs ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1260not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRV635NV35
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 January 2008 (16 years ago)12 May 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120no data
Core clock speed725 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors378 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate5.8003.200
Floating-point processing power0.174 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsFloppy1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0a
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 January 2008 12 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

ATI HD 3650 AGP has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5900 XT, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3650 AGP and GeForce FX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Radeon HD 3650 AGP
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT
GeForce FX 5900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 24 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 14 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.