GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking931not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency0.55no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameR600G80
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 May 2007 (17 years ago)19 November 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320112
Core clock speed743 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors720 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate11.8928.00
Floating-point processing power0.4755 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs1620
TMUs1628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB640 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed828 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth106.0 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 640 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 150 Watt

ATI HD 2900 XT has a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.

8800 GTS 112, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 43.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 XT and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Radeon HD 2900 XT
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 64 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 308 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.