GeForce 6800 GT DDL vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking924not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameR600NV40
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 May 2007 (17 years ago)14 April 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed743 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors720 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate11.895.600
Floating-point processing power0.4755 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1616
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP Pro 8x
Length241 mm305 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed828 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth106.0 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 14 April 2004
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 80 Watt

ATI HD 2900 XT has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

6800 GT DDL, on the other hand, has 168.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 XT and GeForce 6800 GT DDL. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Radeon HD 2900 XT
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT DDL
GeForce 6800 GT DDL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 64 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 6 votes

Rate GeForce 6800 GT DDL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.