GeForce GT 320 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking949not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.56no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameR600GT215
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 December 2007 (16 years ago)2 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32072
Core clock speed600 MHz540 MHz
Number of transistors720 million727 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60012.96
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.1875 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm175 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s25.28 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 December 2007 2 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 43 Watt

GT 320 OEM has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 365.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 PRO and GeForce GT 320 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
GeForce GT 320 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 59 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.