Tegra K1 GPU vs Radeon Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking894not rated
Place by popularity10not in top-100
Power efficiency9.14no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameRenoirGK20A
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)15 October 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448192
Core clock speedno data756 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz951 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt8 Watt
Texture fill rate42.007.608
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS0.3652 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.6ES 3.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-1.1
CUDA-3.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 8 Watt

Graphics has a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Tegra K1 GPU, on the other hand, has 87.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and Tegra K1 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
NVIDIA Tegra K1 GPU
Tegra K1 GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6201 vote

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 8 votes

Rate Tegra K1 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.