Radeon Instinct MI325X vs Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking899not rated
Place by popularity10not in top-100
Power efficiency9.05no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameRenoirAqua Vanjaram
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44819456
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistorsno data153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate42.002,554
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs281216
Tensor Coresno data1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared288 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2525 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.3 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 750 Watt

Graphics has 4900% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI325X, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and Radeon Instinct MI325X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI325X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
Radeon Instinct MI325X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6368 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 23 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI325X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.