Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS vs Radeon Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking907not rated
Place by popularity11not in top-100
Power efficiency9.14no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameRenoirno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448768
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate42.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared8448 MHz
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
OpenGL4.6no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 20 Watt

Graphics has 33.3% lower power consumption.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics is a desktop card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 6882 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 44 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.