Radeon Pro 555X vs Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Place in the ranking	668	505
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	7.72
Architecture	RDNA 2 (2022−2023)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Raphael	Polaris 21
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	26 September 2022 (2 years ago)	16 July 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	768
Core clock speed	no data	907 MHz
Boost clock speed	2200 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	43.54
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.393 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1275 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	81.6 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_2	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−76.5%

30−35
+76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Elden Ring	10−11 −130%	21−24 +130%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Forza Horizon 4	17 −100%	30−35 +100%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −64.3%	21−24 +64.3%
Valorant	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Dota 2	14 −114%	30−33 +114%
Elden Ring	10−11 −130%	21−24 +130%
Far Cry 5	23 −56.5%	35−40 +56.5%
Fortnite	24−27 −88.5%	45−50 +88.5%
Forza Horizon 4	11 −209%	30−35 +209%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −76.3%	65−70 +76.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −64.3%	21−24 +64.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −73.3%	24−27 +73.3%
Valorant	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
World of Tanks	70−75 −70.3%	120−130 +70.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Dota 2	37 +23.3%	30−33 −23.3%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −63.6%	35−40 +63.6%
Forza Horizon 4	9 −278%	30−35 +278%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −76.3%	65−70 +76.3%
Valorant	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Elden Ring	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −40%	40−45 +40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
World of Tanks	30−35 −90.6%	60−65 +90.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Valorant	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
Elden Ring	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
Metro Exodus	0−1	4−5
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Fortnite	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Valorant	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Pro 555X compete in popular games:

Pro 555X is 76% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is 23% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 555X is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games: