Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs Graphics 512SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.66
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRenoirNavi 14
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 March 2020 (6 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121536
Core clock speed400 MHz1187 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz1757 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate67.20168.7
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS5.398 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3296
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 March 2020 4 August 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Graphics 512SP has 733% lower power consumption.

Pro 5500 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 512SP and Radeon Pro 5500 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 512SP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5500 XT is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 99 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 73 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 512SP or Radeon Pro 5500 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.