GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 10 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 51.97 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 18.34 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | Renoir | GB203 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 January 2020 (5 years ago) | 20 February 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $749 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 8960 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 2452 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 9,800 million | 45,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 36.00 | 686.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.152 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 128 |
| TMUs | 24 | 280 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 280 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 70 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 304 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 896.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 10.1 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2020 | 20 February 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 300 Watt |
Graphics 384SP Mobile has 1900% lower power consumption.
RTX 5070 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
