Arc B570 vs Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameRenoirBMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)12 December 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$219

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842304
Core clock speed400 MHz2500 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate36.00360.0
Floating-point processing power1.152 TFLOPS11.52 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs24144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared10 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data380.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 12 December 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

Graphics 384SP Mobile has 900% lower power consumption.

Arc B570, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile and Arc B570. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile is a notebook card while Arc B570 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
Intel Arc B570
Arc B570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 14 votes

Rate Arc B570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.