Radeon R9 FURY X vs Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.81
Power efficiencyno data6.28
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRenoirFiji
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)24 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3204096
Compute unitsno data64
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1400 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate28.00268.8
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS8.602 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs20256
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data195 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data+
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1050 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
CrossFire-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
LiquidVR-+
PowerTune-+
TressFX-+
TrueAudio-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.5
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.3+
Mantle-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 24 June 2015
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 275 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1733% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and Radeon R9 FURY X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 FURY X is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 91 votes

Rate Radeon R9 FURY X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or Radeon R9 FURY X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.