Radeon R7 350 vs Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated672
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.21
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRenoirCape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)6 July 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320512
Core clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate28.0025.60
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2032
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 6 July 2016
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 55 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and Radeon R7 350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 350 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP
AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 578 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or Radeon R7 350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.