T600 vs Radeon E8950

Place in the ranking	382	341
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	10.16	28.64
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Amethyst	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	29 September 2015 (9 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	640
Core clock speed	735 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	1335 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	128.0	53.40
Floating-point processing power	4.096 TFLOPS	1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 −20%	54 +20%
1440p	18−20 −27.8%	23 +27.8%
4K	16−18 −25%	20 +25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset
Full HD
Medium Preset
Full HD
High Preset
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Full HD
Epic Preset
1440p
High Preset
1440p
Ultra Preset
1440p
Epic Preset
4K
High Preset
4K
Ultra Preset
4K
Epic Preset

Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry 5	46 +0%	46 +0%
Fortnite	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Dota 2	121 +0%	121 +0%
Far Cry 5	42 +0%	42 +0%
Fortnite	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	59 +0%	59 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Metro Exodus	26 +0%	26 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	48 +0%	48 +0%
Valorant	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Dota 2	111 +0%	111 +0%
Far Cry 5	39 +0%	39 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27 +0%	27 +0%
Valorant	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Fortnite

85−90

+0%

85−90

+0%

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	27 +0%	27 +0%
Metro Exodus	15 +0%	15 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Valorant	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	26 +0%	26 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Fortnite

35−40

+0%

35−40

+0%

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	25 +0%	25 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Metro Exodus	8 +0%	8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 +0%	16 +0%
Valorant	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	40 +0%	40 +0%
Far Cry 5	12 +0%	12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

Fortnite

16−18

+0%

16−18

+0%

This is how Radeon E8950 and T600 compete in popular games:

T600 is 20% faster in 1080p
T600 is 28% faster in 1440p
T600 is 25% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.64	16.19
Recency	29 September 2015	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	40 Watt

Radeon E8950 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T600, on the other hand, has a 18.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 137.5% lower power consumption.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E8950 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon E8950 is a notebook card while T600 is a workstation one.