Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Radeon E8860

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking667not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.18no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameVenusPonte Vecchio
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date25 January 2014 (10 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64016384
Core clock speed575 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed625 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt2400 Watt
Texture fill rate25.001,638
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS52.43 TFLOPS
ROPs16no data
TMUs401024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1565 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s3,205 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 January 2014 10 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 2400 Watt

Radeon E8860 has 6386.5% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E8860 and Data Center GPU Max Subsystem. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E8860 is a notebook card while Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E8860
Radeon E8860
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E8860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 81 vote

Rate Data Center GPU Max Subsystem on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.