ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430 vs E6760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking856not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.12no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RV6xx (2007−2010)
GPU code nameTurksM82-SE
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 May 2011 (13 years ago)25 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$239.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48040
Core clock speed600 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors716 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate14.401.800
Floating-point performanceno data0.036 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-II
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed3200 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.010.1
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.33.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2011 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 12 Watt

Radeon E6760 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 3430, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E6760 and Mobility Radeon HD 3430. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E6760 is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430
Mobility Radeon HD 3430

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Radeon E6760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 15 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.