GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon E2400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1430not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.36no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV610G84
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)5 October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4032
Core clock speed600 MHz470 MHz
Number of transistors180 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate2.4007.520
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPS0.06016 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIMXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz635 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s20.32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 5 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 20 Watt

ATI E2400 has a 23.1% more advanced lithography process.

8600M GT Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E2400 and GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon E2400
Radeon E2400
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition
GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.