Radeon Instinct MI300 vs ATI DDR

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameRage 6Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2000 (24 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data14080
Core clock speed166 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors30 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate11,496
Floating-point processing powerno data47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs2no data
TMUs6880
Tensor Coresno data880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.0N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL1.3N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2000 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 600 Watt

ATI DDR has 2508.7% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 22 years, a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon DDR and Radeon Instinct MI300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon DDR is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon DDR
Radeon DDR
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon DDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 25 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.