Quadro 4100 vs ATI Radeon 9800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1423not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.28no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameR350GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1344
Core clock speed325 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistors117 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate2.60089.26
ROPs832
TMUs8112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed290 MHz1782 MBps
Memory bandwidth18.56 GB/s57.02 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro 4100 has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 435.7% more advanced lithography process, and 5.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 and Quadro 4100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9800 is a desktop card while Quadro 4100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800
Radeon 9800
NVIDIA Quadro 4100
Quadro 4100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 10 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.